Assisted Living
Memory Care
Independent Living
Senior Living
Sign in
A senior couple looks at a laptop while a younger woman talks with them

The CLASS Act: How It Could Have Benefited Seniors and What’s Next for Long-Term Care

3 minute readLast updated October 11, 2022
Written by Michaela Kitchen

The Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act was a benefit plan established by the Affordable Care Act of 2010. Meant to be a publicly administered insurance program, the CLASS Act aimed to help Americans should they become disabled or in need of long-term care and support. The assistance offered by the act would have been especially beneficial to seniors as it’s common for disability rates to rise with age. Services included home care, adult day care, and nursing home stays.[1]

Let our care assessment guide you

Our free tool provides options, advice, and next steps based on your unique situation.

Take our free care quiz

Key Takeaways

  1. The CLASS Act was meant to ensure all Americans had access to long-term care. The program would have specifically benefited seniors as they are a population that most commonly needs this kind of support.
  2. With its high monthly costs, the act's coverages were deemed out of reach for most. As a result, the act was repealed.
  3. After the repeal of the CLASS Act, congress created a commission on long-term care. The commission was tasked with creating a program to replace the CLASS act, but it was unable to reach an agreement.
  4. There are other long-term care resources available. Through public support programs like Medicaid and Veterans Affairs benefits, seniors can continue to plan for their long-term care needs.

Financed through five years of voluntary payroll deductions paid by the recipient, the CLASS Act was to provide lifetime benefits for services and support. The program was for those unable to perform two or more functional daily living activities, like self-feeding or bathing, or who needed help due to cognitive impairment.[01]

However, financial analysts found that the program’s premium costs would have been far too expensive for most and were projected to be financially unsustainable. The act was widely criticized and called on to be reformed or repealed, and, the CLASS Act was never actually implemented. On January 1, 2013, the New Year’s Day budget agreement officially repealed the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act.[02]

Financial limitations of the CLASS Act

For most Americans, seniors especially, the cost of care is a main determinant of the care they choose for themselves. Premiums would need to range from $123 to $240 per paycheck for the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act to be financially sustainable. With these costly premium projections, many did not think the CLASS Act was viable.[01]

Medicaid, another governmental program for necessary medical services, differs from the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports program by only covering short-term stays in senior nursing facilities versus the long-term and variety of care that would have been offered by CLASS.

The CLASS program was designed to work in conjunction with Medicaid benefits while being the primary payer of benefits for eligible individuals. CLASS program benefits would not have affected eligibility for Medicaid or other governmental aide programs.

Let our care assessment guide you

Our free tool provides options, advice, and next steps based on your unique situation.

How CLASS would have benefited disabled seniors and what’s available now

For disabled seniors, the CLASS Act was supposed to serve those who anticipated needing senior services such as home care, adult day care, or other senior living options. The program aimed to achieve this by providing cash benefits to pay for daily living support and services. By having money set aside for future care, seniors could be confident they’d have access to future daily living care and support.

A particular benefit of the CLASS program was allowing seniors to have access to senior living communities or in-home care without financial stipulations. Although this benefit could have been very helpful, with such high premiums estimated, it would have become inaccessible for those who needed it most.

After the repeal of the CLASS program, Congress created the Commission on Long-Term Care. The Commission was a panel consisting of members appointed from the White House and Democratic and Republican members of the House and Senate. The goal of the commission was to come up with a plan to create and finance a program that would help individuals in need of long-term care support.[01] While the Commission completed a report in 2013 with recommendations, no agreement was reached.[03]

Talk with a Senior Living Advisor

Our advisors help 300,000 families each year find the right senior care for their loved ones.

Ways for seniors to pay for care

Although the CLASS Act did not become reality, there are still many financial options available for seniors who want to secure their future. When planning for long-term care costs, it’s important to consider location, needed care services, preferred accommodations and amenities, and other factors that might impact care price.

While preparing for future living accommodations is overwhelming, it can be easier with careful planning and the investigation of currently available programs and resources. Consider looking into VA benefits, Medicaid, and other public support resources. For more guidance, connect with a Senior Living Advisor. They will be able to help match you with care and assistance that fulfills your needs.

SHARE THE ARTICLE

  1. Kenen, J. (2011, May 12). The CLASS Act. Health Affairs.

  2. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2015, August 31). Long-term care in the United States: A timeline.

Michaela Kitchen is a former copywriter at A Place for Mom, where she focused on senior living trends, resources relevant to the families of seniors, senior lifestyle tips, and health care. Previously, she worked in television and print journalism, social media management, and marketing. She holds a bachelor's degree from Kansas State University in journalism and mass communications.
Read more
Jordan Kimbrell is a former copyeditor at A Place For Mom, where she worked with writers to produce articles and web pages that answer the most pressing questions related to senior living. With over a decade of experience as an editor and writer, Jordan holds a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree from Truman State University and Kansas State University, respectively.
Read more
Learn more about our Editorial Guidelines

The information contained on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute medical, legal or financial advice or create a professional relationship between A Place for Mom and the reader. Always seek the advice of your health care provider, attorney or financial advisor with respect to any particular matter, and do not act or refrain from acting on the basis of anything you have read on this site. Links to third-party websites are only for the convenience of the reader; A Place for Mom does not endorse the contents of the third-party sites.

Make the best senior care decision